Courtesy of Ecologist http://ht.ly/27Pva   :
24th June, 2010
British companies accused of profiting from emissions trading scheme while consumers foot the bill
British companies are taking part in a complex carbon credits trading scheme that has created a lucrative and inefficient market for the destruction of a potent greenhouse gas.
The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) has criticised Barclays Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland and British Gas of colluding with a number of Chinese and Indian chemical companies in financing the destruction of HFC-23.
HFC-23 is a greenhouse gas around 11,700 more potent than carbon dioxide and is produced as a by-product of the creation of the commonly used refrigerant gas HCFC-22.
Barclays and RBS are alleged to be providing financial backing to mainly Indian and Chinese chemical companies who are able to destroy the gas for as little as €0.17 per tonne of carbon dioxide-equivalent before selling emissions grants on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for as much as €12.
British Gas is accused of purchasing these emissions credits at inflated prices and passing the costs onto their customers.
EIA campaigner Fionnuala Walravens said HFC-23 should be removed from any trading schemes and dealt with separately.
‘These companies are paying a lot of money for these credits and what we are arguing is that in this specific case of HFC-23 that is very cheap to destroy, it doesn’t make any sense to have it in the carbon market.’
Both Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland declined to comment on their involvement in HFC-23 credit trading. Centrica, the parent company of British Gas, said it had only ‘limited involvement’ in the projects.
The World Development Movement (WDM) said that despite their public silence on the issue, companies were known to be lobbying in favour of keeping the trading scheme.
‘The rules should prevent this dodgy carbon trading from happening but it’s corporate lobbying from banks that are very interested in the lucrative business of trading carbon credits and British and European industrial companies which have lobbied in order to be able to keep emitting while paying for these offsets,’ said policy officer Tim Jones.
EIA say an amendment to remove HFC-23 from trading schemes was proposed at a recent summit but is likely to be opposed by India and China.

Barclays Bank, British Gas and RBS implicated in ‘scandalous’ carbon trading scheme Courtesy of Ecologist http://ht.ly/27Pva   for full text go here:24th June, 2010
British companies accused of profiting from emissions trading scheme while consumers foot the bill
British companies are taking part in a complex carbon credits trading scheme that has created a lucrative and inefficient market for the destruction of a potent greenhouse gas.
The Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) has criticised Barclays Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland and British Gas of colluding with a number of Chinese and Indian chemical companies in financing the destruction of HFC-23.
HFC-23 is a greenhouse gas around 11,700 more potent than carbon dioxide and is produced as a by-product of the creation of the commonly used refrigerant gas HCFC-22.
Barclays and RBS are alleged to be providing financial backing to mainly Indian and Chinese chemical companies who are able to destroy the gas for as little as €0.17 per tonne of carbon dioxide-equivalent before selling emissions grants on the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for as much as €12.
British Gas is accused of purchasing these emissions credits at inflated prices and passing the costs onto their customers.
EIA campaigner Fionnuala Walravens said HFC-23 should be removed from any trading schemes and dealt with separately.  ‘These companies are paying a lot of money for these credits and what we are arguing is that in this specific case of HFC-23 that is very cheap to destroy, it doesn’t make any sense to have it in the carbon market.’ Both Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland declined to comment on their involvement in HFC-23 credit trading. Centrica, the parent company of British Gas, said it had only ‘limited involvement’ in the projects. The World Development Movement (WDM) said that despite their public silence on the issue, companies were known to be lobbying in favour of keeping the trading scheme.
‘The rules should prevent this dodgy carbon trading from happening but it’s corporate lobbying from banks that are very interested in the lucrative business of trading carbon credits and British and European industrial companies which have lobbied in order to be able to keep emitting while paying for these offsets,’ said policy officer Tim Jones.
EIA say an amendment to remove HFC-23 from trading schemes was proposed at a recent summit but is likely to be opposed by India and China.

 

Comments are closed.

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.

Plan It Green Printing is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache